MVNOs spent 2025 oscillating between breakout growth and existential crisis. From Thailand’s effective shutdown of its MVNO sector to the quiet ascendancy of fintech embedded-mobile plays, this year crystallized a truth that industry insiders have been keenly aware of for more than two decades: that the MVNO model is not inherently fragile.
As we enter the holiday season and reflect on what matters to us as an industry, the global MVNO industry reached approximately USD 87 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 148 billion by 2035. Yet this masks the more complex conditions: regional divergence, regulatory failure in key markets, and that pesky truth that operator execution—not market conditions—actually drives MVNO success or failure.
This analysis draws from market reports, analyst insights, and regulatory consultations. It reflects on the trends that actually moved markets and the topics that ranked inside forums, LinkedIn discourse, and policy discussions.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- Global MVNO Growth: Impressive Numbers (If You Can Hack It)
- Regulatory Failure as an Extinction Event: Thailand Tanks
- Consolidation, Duopolies & the Myth of “Competition-Friendly” Mergers
- Regulation 2.0: It’s a Drag—Cybersecurity, Lawful Intercept & Compliance
- Another One Bites the Dust: The Persistence of MVNO Execution Failures
- Staying Alive: Discount, IoT, and eSIM—Oh My!
- Party in the USA: Boom Times and Their Time Limits
- Money Talks and More: Fintech Mobile-as-a-Service & the Rise of “Feature MVNOs”
- Nothing but Lip Service: MVNOs, Innovation, and MWC
- Speak Out: The Search-and-Social Reputation Economy—MVNOs Under the Influence
MVNO 2025: TOP 10 REALITY CHECK
1. Global MVNO Growth: Impressive Numbers (If You Can Hack It)
[OPPORTUNITY] | Opportunity Focus | Global Impact
On paper, 2025 was a banner year for MVNOs. Future Market Insights projects the global MVNO market at roughly USD 87 billion in 2025, growing toward about USD 148 billion by 2035 at a high-single-digit CAGR.[1] GSMA Intelligence reports that the number of MVNOs worldwide has grown by more than 60% in the last decade.[2]
Market Size by Region (2025 Estimates):[1][3]
- North America: USD 37 billion (7.5% CAGR)
- Europe: USD 30 billion (6.5% CAGR)
- Asia-Pacific: USD 26 billion (12.2% CAGR—fastest growing)
- Latin America: USD 9 billion (8.8% CAGR)
- Middle East & Africa: USD 7 billion (15.5% growth potential)
Critical Caveat: Growth is highly uneven.[1] North America and parts of Western Europe look healthy; Asia-Pacific surges; yet emerging markets like Thailand show that license counts can surge even as actual, competitive MVNOs vanish.[2][3] 2025’s growth story is therefore less about raw numbers and more about where wholesale policy, infrastructure, and execution align to turn projections into durable businesses.[2][4]
2. Regulatory Failure as an Extinction Event: Thailand Tanks
[CRITICAL] | Controversy Focus | Asia-Pacific Impact
Thailand’s MVNO sector did not simply struggle in 2025—it died.[3] Despite more than 600 type-1 licenses issued over the past decade, MVNOs were left to wither with only a handful of operating players left by mid-2025.[3][18] Detailed legal and policy analysis traces this implosion to the NBTC’s failure to enforce wholesale access and competitive merger conditions, effectively turning mandated MVNO frameworks into dead letters.[3][18][19]
Key Data Points:[3][18]
- Licenses Issued: 600+
- Viable Operators (June 2025): Handful
- Enforcement Actions: 0
- Impact: Job losses, business closures, potential litigation, regulatory credibility collapse
Key Insight: Non-enforcement is not neutral policy—it is an active choice that can wipe out an entire competitive layer.[3][18][19]
3. Consolidation, Duopolies & the Myth of “Competition-Friendly” Mergers
[CRITICAL] | Controversy Focus | Europe, Asia, Latin America Impact
In 2025, mergers and market structure moved from abstract risk to concrete MVNO killers.[5][6][25] Analysts documented how accelerated consolidation in Europe, Asia, and Latin America reduced the number of host networks, concentrated power, and weakened MVNO bargaining positions even where access obligations still existed on paper.[5][6][25]
The Thailand True–DTAC Case Study:
Thailand’s True–DTAC merger was approved with MVNO access remedies that looked robust in theory, but three years later no meaningful MVNO competition had emerged and no enforcement had materialized.[18][19] Commentators argue that the combination of merger approval and remedy non-enforcement locked in a de facto duopoly and sealed the fate of smaller players.[18][19]
eSIM as a Regulatory Wildcard:
Regulators increasingly overlook the impact of eSIM in merger remedy design, even though it fundamentally changes how entry barriers and distribution work.[2][30][32] Post-merger, consolidated hosts can control eSIM provisioning and commercial terms just as tightly as physical SIM distribution, blunting the theoretical entry benefits of digital onboarding.[2][30][32]
A decade after best-practice MVNO merger guidelines were circulated to major regulators, “competition-friendly merger” language is often perceived inside the MVNO community as aspirational messaging rather than enforceable market structure.[5][18][25] The lesson is simple: remedies only exist if someone is prepared to enforce them, and they must anticipate new technologies like eSIM instead of assuming legacy models.[5][18][25][30]
4. Regulation 2.0: It’s a Drag—Cybersecurity, Lawful Intercept & Compliance
[HIGH RISK] | Controversy Focus | Developed Markets Impact
While some regulators failed to enforce basic wholesale access, others tightened cybersecurity, privacy, and lawful intercept rules that fall heavily on MVNOs.[7][8][9] European and Australian discussions in 2025 highlighted how new security regimes, cloud-sovereignty debates, and data-retention mandates increased compliance complexity for smaller operators that never owned the RAN.[7][8][9]
Estimated Compliance Overhead: 15–25% of operational expenses for MVNOs implementing new security regimes.[7][9]
As 2025 closed, insiders increasingly framed “Regulation 2.0” not just as a privacy and security necessity, but as a potential barrier that may push smaller MVNOs either to upscale governance capabilities or retreat into simpler, less innovative models.[7][8][9]
5. Another One Bites the Dust: The Persistence of MVNO Execution Failures
[HIGH RISK] | Controversy Focus | Global Impact
Regulators are not the only culprits in 2025’s MVNO failures. Numerous brands continued to repeat familiar mistakes: copy-and-paste discount positioning, under-investment in customer experience, weak operational support, and poor network or service quality.[4][17][29]
Industry practitioners emphasize that many collapses stem from execution gaps rather than from any structural flaw in the MVNO model itself.[4][17][26][27][28]
Kevin Maag, CEO of IntegraTouch and Symphony Billing: “Legacy BSS platforms weren’t built for the kind of MVNOs we see emerging today. They were designed for telcos with big budgets, long product cycles, and slow, hierarchical decision-making. But modern MVNOs? They move fast, test often, and build communities.”[26]
Damien Hansen, founder of Fastter: “Too often, we see ambitious new telco players swing for the fences, hoping to hit a home run. Yet without a ready and engaged customer base, they face a long, expensive path to commercial success.”[27]
Magdalena Bitz, expert on Full MVNO business models: “A Full MVNO project is complex and requires a clear understanding of your target market, a unique value proposition, and a well-defined business strategy. I always recommend taking such a decision in steps.”[28]
Contributors to MVNO Index reiterate basic success factors: reliable service, strong billing visibility, and solid customer support as non-negotiable foundations before chasing flashy innovation.[17][29] The patterns of failure are well known; the challenge is getting operators and investors to prioritize operational hygiene and disciplined go-to-market above short-term marketing noise.[4][17][29]
6. Staying Alive: Discount, IoT, and eSIM—Oh My!
[MIXED – OPPORTUNITY + CONTROVERSY] | Global Impact
Consumer-facing MVNOs posted steady gains in 2025, with several forecasts projecting subscriber counts rising from roughly 68.5 million in 2025 to about 84.5 million by 2030, driven by discount, youth, ethnic, and digital-only brands.[12][20][31] These players benefit from flexible pricing, digital acquisition, and the growing normalization of switching providers for better value.[12][20]
The eSIM Acceleration Story for Consumer & Discount MVNOs
Research indicates that more than 60% of smartphones in active use now support eSIM, sharply reducing logistical friction for MVNO onboarding.[30][32] eSIM-only and eSIM-first brands launched in 2025 reported activation journeys up to 30–40% faster than those relying on physical SIMs, with lower distribution costs and improved conversion from online marketing funnels.[30][31]
For discount MVNOs specifically, eSIM technology allows instant activation and plan selection directly from devices, which is especially attractive to price-sensitive consumers who expect near-instant service.[30][31] However, the benefits depend entirely on host MNO policies: where wholesale eSIM access is restricted or priced at a premium, the cost advantage evaporates and eSIM becomes another point of control.[30][32]
The IoT eSIM Opportunity
Updated eSIM standards now bridge consumer and IoT profiles, opening opportunities across manufacturing, logistics, utilities, transportation, and energy for flexible, remotely managed connectivity.[11][13][32][33] Analysts note that eSIM for IoT reduces truck-rolls, accelerates deployment, and simplifies lifecycle management across multi-country footprints.[11][13][32]
Consumer IoT use cases like pet tracking and wearables illustrate how eSIM-enabled GPS devices provide reliable coverage in areas where Bluetooth-style crowd networks struggle.[34][35] A niche but profitable segment of MVNOs and IoT carriers has emerged around these specialized applications, monetizing connectivity plus device and service bundles.[11][32][34]
The Reality Check for IoT-First MVNOs
Despite forecasts that cellular IoT connectivity revenues will surpass USD 30 billion globally, many IoT-focused MVNOs under-delivered in 2025.[11][13] Fragmented regulations, complex enterprise sales cycles, competition from hyperscalers, and the technical overhead of eSIM orchestration all compressed margins for pure connectivity plays.[11][13]
Industry commentary increasingly concludes that connectivity is just one piece of the enterprise stack; IoT MVNOs that fail to pair it with analytics, vertical integrations, or platform services struggle to build defensible business models.[11][13][22]
7. Party in the USA: Boom Times and Their Time Limits
[OPPORTUNITY] | Opportunity Focus (with Caution) | North America Impact
The United States continued to serve as the poster child for MVNO scalability in 2025, amplified by the headline-grabbing acquisition of Mint Mobile.[20][21] Various reports estimate the US MVNO market at roughly USD 30–32 billion in 2025, with projections climbing toward around USD 53 billion by 2032 at about 7.5% CAGR.[20][21]
Why the US Works:[1][20][21]
- Mature wholesale frameworks with relatively transparent reference offers
- Multiple host networks (AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile) supporting genuine wholesale competition
- Established MVNO brands (Boost, Cricket, Metro, Mint, cable-backed players, and retailers) with proven economics
- Cable operators and retailers such as Best Buy and Walmart deepening their MVNO participation
- Accelerating eSIM adoption that weakens historical control of SIM distribution
Service-provider MVNOs—those controlling their own billing, customer care, and bundling—hold the largest value share of the global market and are projected to grow around 9% annually, a model heavily represented in the US.[1][15][20]
Still, structural risks remain.[5][6][7][21][25] Consolidation among host networks, evolving spectrum and competition policy, and the possibility that MNO parents may eventually tighten wholesale economics once MVNOs become “too successful” all hang over the medium-term outlook.
8. Money Talks and More: Fintech Mobile-as-a-Service & the Rise of “Feature MVNOs”
[OPPORTUNITY] | Opportunity Focus | Digital Markets Impact
A different class of MVNO captured outsized optimism in 2025: fintech and app-centric players that treat connectivity as a feature rather than a standalone product.[10][15][30] These “feature MVNOs” embed SIMs, phone numbers, and mobile identity into financial services, loyalty schemes, and app ecosystems as trust anchors, KYC rails, and engagement tools.[10][15]
Market Projection: Fintech MVNOs represented under 5% of global MVNO revenue in 2024 but could reach 8–12% by 2027 if current momentum continues.[10][15]
Consultancies and vendors increasingly pitch mobile-as-a-service bundles—combining connectivity, identity, and payments—as the next evolution of co-branded or affinity-based offers, especially in markets where traditional discount niches are saturated.[10][15][30]
The open question for 2026 is whether these models can maintain regulatory clarity and healthy unit economics once they scale beyond pilot programs into heavily regulated jurisdictions.[7][10][23] Balancing telecom rules, financial compliance, data-protection obligations, and cross-border operations will test both fintech partners and host networks.[7][10][23]
9. Nothing but Lip Service: MVNOs, Innovation, and MWC
[CRITICAL] | Controversy Focus | Global Impact
According to multiple first-hand accounts, MVNO insiders left the 2025 MVNO Summit at MWC with a familiar sense of déjà vu.[14][36][37] Despite a seemingly targeted agenda, the event again devoted limited airtime to the structural issues that actually determine MVNO success, instead emphasizing generalized “how to launch an MVNO” content.[14][36][37]
Commentary from MVNO Index describes a recurring pattern: a pay-to-play, sponsor-driven format that prioritizes polished slideware over hard conversations about wholesale terms, consolidation, and regulatory enforcement.[14][36] Participants noted that while MVNOs were repeatedly praised for their potential role in innovation, the summit avoided deep engagement with the power imbalance between MNOs and MVNOs.[14][36][37]
Observers argue that systemic barriers—such as unfavorable wholesale pricing, limited transparency around network access, and entrenched anti-competitive practices—remained largely off the official agenda.[18][23][36] Critics questioned why MVNOs continue to receive less than 1% of the conference’s effective airtime given their growing market impact.[36]
Post-event discussions across LinkedIn and Reddit outlined what a more useful summit would look like: candid sessions on wholesale buy groups, price-setting norms, enforceable merger remedies, and practical pathways to leveraging eSIM and network slicing without replicating legacy power structures.[24][36][37] Attendees instead left with high-level talking points but little that shifted the underlying dynamics.[14][36]
10. Speak Out: The Search-and-Social Reputation Economy—MVNOs Under the Influence
[MIXED – RISK + ACCOUNTABILITY] | Global Impact
By 2025, MVNOs were no longer operating in a quiet corner of the telecom world. Their successes and failures now play out in real time across niche forums, national subreddits, LinkedIn commentary, and X threads alongside official filings and consultations.[24][36][39]
The MVNO Index itself reports reaching nearly 4 million impressions over the past year, highlighting how a focused publication can help set the agenda on regulatory crises, merger impacts, and practical “don’t do this” lessons for new entrants.[16][40] At the same time, consumer communities routinely circulate informal blacklists of MVNOs they would “never consider,” surfacing operational failures that might once have remained buried in internal complaint logs.[24][39]
In this environment, SEO footprints and social engagement metrics function less as vanity indicators and more as early-warning signals. When “MVNO failure” or “regulatory neglect” begins trending, it can prompt questions from investors, regulators, journalists, and competitors almost immediately.[16][24][39] MVNOs, MNOs, and policymakers are all discovering that reputational feedback loops now move faster than traditional consultation cycles.[16][24][39]
On That Note: Full Circle
This reputational shift loops back to the story of Thailand’s collapse.[3][18][39] The regulatory failure there accumulated over years, enabled in part by limited scrutiny and the assumption that wholesale obligations could remain unenforced without consequence.[3][18][19] With today’s more transparent search-and-social landscape, similar patterns may be harder to hide; stakeholders have more tools to surface red flags before an entire competitive layer disappears.[16][24][39]
If MVNO insiders, regulators, and consumers use this visibility to demand accountability and push for genuine innovation, future retrospectives may describe how the industry learned from 2025’s missteps rather than repeating them.[16][22][39] The open question is whether the same energy that fuels online criticism can be channeled into constructive reform and differentiated, durable MVNO models.[16][22][39]
REGIONAL MVNO DYNAMICS
North America (USD 37B, 2025): Mature wholesale frameworks, multiple competing host networks, strong consumer MVNO brands, accelerating eSIM adoption, and growing concern about further consolidation.[1][20][21]
Europe (USD 30B, 2025): Regulatory tightening, continued MNO consolidation, slower consumer innovation than in the US, active debates over eSIM standardization, and room for digital-first MVNOs to differentiate.[1][5][7][25][30]
Asia-Pacific (USD 26B, 2025 | 12.2% CAGR): Fastest-growing region overall, with high smartphone penetration and expanding middle-class demand, but significant regulatory inconsistency and headline risks exemplified by Thailand.[1][3][18][19]
Latin America (USD 9B, 2025): Emerging MVNO markets focused on affordability, facing economic volatility and host consolidation but showing strong growth in data-centric and youth-focused propositions.[1][2][5]
Middle East & Africa (USD 7B, 2025 | 15.5% growth potential): Highest theoretical growth, but constrained by patchy infrastructure, regulatory capacity gaps, and uneven enforcement of wholesale obligations.[1][2][5]
INVESTMENT AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS
For Investors
- Execution discipline is the differentiator, not market size.[4][7][11][22]
- Geographic focus matters: established frameworks in the US and parts of Europe offer clearer risk profiles than frontier markets with weak enforcement.[1][2][5][18][20]
- Specialization wins: fintech, IoT, digital-only brands are generally outpacing generic discount offers when execution is strong.[10][11][12][13][15]
- Regulatory risk is real and material, especially around mergers and eSIM access, and must be priced explicitly into business cases.[5][7][18][19]
- eSIM adoption enables leaner consumer acquisition but shifts leverage toward hosts that control provisioning and wholesale terms.[2][30][32]
For Policymakers
- Enforcement is policy; ignoring wholesale obligations or merger remedies is functionally equivalent to endorsing concentration.[3][5][18][19]
- Merger conditions need clear monitoring mechanisms and meaningful consequences for non-compliance.[5][18][19][25]
- Fair, non-discriminatory eSIM access, including for smaller MVNOs, should be treated as an essential component of modern wholesale policy.[2][30][32]
- Cybersecurity and data-protection mandates should be risk-based and proportionate so they do not unintentionally favor vertically integrated incumbents.[7][8][9]
- Cross-regional learning is critical: replicating license counts without importing working wholesale frameworks leads to Thailand-style outcomes.[3][5][18][19]
For MVNOs
- Disciplined go-to-market strategy and clear positioning are non-negotiable; chasing everyone with a weak discount offer is a recipe for churn and failure.[4][17][29]
- Specialization—whether demographic, vertical, or feature-based—creates more defensible niches than generic prepaid competition.[10][11][12][13][15]
- eSIM readiness and digital onboarding should be treated as table stakes, not optional extras.[2][30][31][32]
- Treat compliance and security maturity as potential differentiators in B2B and fintech-adjacent markets.[7][8][9][10]
- Innovation requires sustained investment in BSS, data, analytics, and customer experience, rather than relying on surface-level branding alone.[4][15][22][29][30]
CONCLUSION
By 2025, the MVNO industry combined impressive market-size headlines with stark regional divergence.[1][2][20][21] Some markets with strong wholesale frameworks and credible enforcement thrived, while others with weak regulation or unchecked consolidation saw MVNO layers hollowed out or eliminated.[3][5][18][19][25]
Looking ahead to 2026, three patterns are likely to dominate:
- Regulatory Reckoning: Thailand’s failure will spark policy work on enforceable MVNO access globally—especially around eSIM access mandates and merger remedy enforcement.[1][2][7][10][11][22][30]
- Execution Obsession: Investors and analysts will treat MVNO business-model hygiene as a minimum table stake.[3][4][7][18][19]
- Specialization & Technology Differentiation: Generic discount and data MVNOs will continue to struggle. Winners will be fintech-integrated, vertical-focused, eSIM-native, or data-driven operators.[1][2][10][11][22]
The MVNO model itself is not broken.[3][4][7][18][19] What fails are weakly executed ventures, regulators that shy away from enforcement, and stakeholders who chase narratives instead of fundamentals. The next generation of MVNO insiders knows this. 2026 will be the year it matters.
REFERENCES
[1] Future Market Insights – MVNO Market Size, Demand & Trends 2025–2035.
[2] GSMA Intelligence – MVNOs in Focus: the state of the market and trends shaping growth.
[3] Yozzo – Thailand’s MVNOs Collapse Due to Regulatory Neglect.
[4] FOSR Law – Why so few MVNOs? It’s the economics (industry legal commentary on MVNO business viability)
[5] Strand Consult – Analyses on European telecom consolidation and regulation.
[6] Deloitte – Wireless telecom consolidation speeds up (global telecom M&A outlook)
[7] EY – Top 10 risks for telecommunications in 2025 (including regulation and cybersecurity)
[8] MVNO Index – Navigating Australia’s tighter telecom regulations (Regulation 2.0 case study)
[9] TechZine – Telecom industry fears high costs due to cybersecurity regulation.
[10] Spenza – MVNO for Fintech: Why Mobile is the Next Big Feature.
[11] Juniper Research – Cellular IoT Connectivity Revenue forecasts.
[12] TechLED World – Coverage of consumer MVNO growth and digital brands
[13] Straits Research – IoT MVNO Market Size.
[14] MVNO Index – MVNO + MWC: In Search of Innovation
[15] CSG – The Future of MVNOs (strategic outlook on new MVNO models)
[16] MVNO Index – 2.5 Million Impressions: Setting the Agenda on MVNO Policy & Regulation (2025)
[17] MVNO Index – Examples of the biggest mistakes of MVNOs
[18] Yozzo – Duopoly dominance & regulatory failure in Thailand.
[19] Yozzo – 1,000 Days True–DTAC Merger (enforcement and competition review)
[20] Pipeline Magazine – 2025 MVNO Growth Breakout
[21] PS Market Research – U.S. MVNO Market Size and Growth Report.
[22] McKinsey – The future of telcos (including IoT and platform strategies)
[23] Mondaq – Can You Hear Me Now? Telecom Challenges (regulatory and legal risks)
[24] Reddit r/NoContract – MVNO Community Discussions (2025)
[25] IEEE ComSoc – Wireless network operator consolidation (impact on competition and MVNOs)
[26] Kevin Maag – IntegraTouch/Symphony Billing (industry commentary on MVNO BSS needs)
[27] Damien Hansen – Fastter (founder insights on MVNO go-to-market pitfalls)
[28] Magdalena Bay – Expert analysis on full MVNO business models
[29] MVNO Index – Churn Reduction & Customer Experience playbooks
[30] Spenza – How eSIM Is Disrupting the MVNO Market.
[31] MVNO Index – Discount MVNOs & eSIM Impact
[32] Transatel – The Rise of eSIM (consumer and IoT profiles).
[33] PureWL – Choosing the Right eSIM for IoT.
[34] TailMe – AirTag vs GPS Tracker: Pet Tracking.
[35] SeeWorld GPS – Is AirTag Good for Cats?
[36] MVNO Index – MVNOs + MWC: A Missed Opportunity. Again?!? (2025)
[37] MVNO Index – Additional MWC 2025 summit commentary and follow-up posts
[38] Reddit r/NoContract – MVNO community reflections on MWC and wholesale issues (2025)
[39] MVNO Index – The Social Accountability of MVNOs in 2025
[40] MVNO Index – 2.5 Million / 3 Million Impressions Later series on influence and reach
Guest Blogs are written by carefully selected Experts. If you also want to create a Guest blog then Contact us.